mental health mental health
mental health Unholy Assault
Psychiatry Versus Religion

Report and recommendations on
psychiatry's subversion of
religious belief and practice
ABUSE CASE
INVESTIGATION FORM
If you know of an abuse by a mental health practitioner, please REPORT IT!
Click here to fill out the form.
Home
The Real Crisis
Massive Fraud
Psychiatric Hoax
Pseudoscience
Schizophrenia
The Brutal Reality
Psychiatric Rape
Deadly Restraints
Psychiatry
Rehab Fraud
Child Drugging
Harming Youth
Community Ruin
Harming Artists
Unholy Assault
Eroding Justice
Elderly Abuse
Chaos And Terror
Creating Racism
Citizens Commission
on Human Rights
Media
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
 

 

Using Sexual Perversion as a Weapon

In World History of Psychiatry, author John G. Howles notes, �As long as psychiatric problems were those of the �soul,�� the clergy and philosophers �could be professionally concerned with such problems.� To re-define man�s problems and criminal conduct in �medical� or �biological� terms was half the trick in wrenching spiritual healing firmly into the domain of psychiatry. The other half of the trick was using this same premise to lure churches into handing over their sexually disturbed clergy for �professional help.�

In 1951, the Institute of Living psychiatric facility in Connecticut, U.S.A., hired as its psychiatrist-in-chief, Francis J. Braceland, later to become president of the American Psychiatric Association (APA). According to an article in The New Yorker in 2003, Braceland called on Catholic bishops to shed their �traditional antipathy to the teachings of psychiatry and to seek medical help for troubled priests.� With Braceland�s high standing among the bishops, the Institute of Living began receiving referrals.

In 1986, a priest with a known history of pedophilia and psychiatric treatment was accused of child molestation. He was referred to the Institute of Living for psychiatric help. In his discharge records, psychiatrist Robert Swords stated: �It was not a classical case of pedophilia, in that the abuse was sporadic and eventually did stop and had a playful, childlike quality to it. It was not sexually stimulating or eroticized, and it was not sadistic nor without remorse.� Psychiatrists advised that he could return to his parish, although they said, the final decision lay with the Church.

�The patient reassured us that these impulsive episodes of pedophilia were now under control and he had integrated his life in a more constructive way, since he began getting involved in psychotherapy and seeing a psychiatrist ten years ago,� Swords wrote.

In 1991, there were further complaints of sexual abuse of children by that same priest. Based on psychiatric advice that the priest was �sick,� not criminal, he was referred to another psychiatric facility. There patients were stripped, hooked up to a plethysmograph (a device that when attached to the genitals can measure arousal) and videotaped. The priest eventually admitted to having been a pedophile since the 1960s. In September 2002, the Archdiocese of Boston settled 86 lawsuits against this priest for $10 million�a high price to pay for ruinous psychiatric advice.

As journalist Barry Werth wrote, �The Church�s use of psychiatry or, more precisely, the bishops� policy of sending priests suspected of having molested minors to psychiatrists and psychologists rather than reporting them to the police, has become one of the most disturbing, and costly, elements.�

Next

Back to Contents

 

 

If you wish to view the booklets listed on the left with their full graphics and footnoted data source information,
you will need Adobe Reader which can be downloaded free from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.
Then Click Here for the full version shown in Adobe Acrobat.
Note: DSL or Cable Modem are need for faster download and only the English version is available for viewing at this time.
Copyright 2004 � by CCHR. All Rights Reserved. Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR and the CCHR logo are trademarks and service marks owned by Citizens Commission on Human Rights.
Webmaster: [email protected]
Website design by: www.DesignbyDean.com