|
Using Schools
to Create a Mental Health State
Clifford Beers, a former psychiatric patient, formed the National Committee
on Mental Hygiene in the United Kingdom in 1909. The Committee’s “Program for
the Prevention of Delinquency” helped create “child guidance clinics” (psychiatric
counseling) around the globe; it was the driving force behind the entry of mental
hygiene concepts into schools. “If we are going to prevent dependency, delinquency,
insanity, and general inadequacy,” wrote Ralph Truitt, the head of the Committee’s
Division of Child Guidance Clinics in 1927, “...[T]he school should be the focus
of our attack.”
And attacked it was.
Sixty years later, in a report to the U.S. Secretary of Education, the National
Commission on Excellence in Education stated, “If an unfriendly power had attempted
to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today,
we might well have viewed it as an act of war.”
What the Commission did not realize was that an attack on the school system
had been launched and was still in operation. Proclaiming the strategic objectives
of global psychiatry before Britain’s National Council of Mental Hygiene in
1940, psychiatrist John R. Rees, who would soon after co-found the World Federation
for Mental Health (WFMH), left no doubt that he and his peers had their sights
set on education: “[W]e have made a useful attack upon a number of professions.
The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the
Church; the two most difficult are law and medicine.” [Emphasis added]
Another WFMH cofounder, psychiatrist G. Brock Chisholm, furthered the attack
by using schools to eliminate morals: “The training of children is making a
thousand neurotics for every one that psychiatry can hope to help with psychotherapy,”
he said in 1945. “We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed
us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers. … If the race is to be
freed from its crippling burden of good and evil it must be psychiatrists who
take the original responsibility.”
At a WFMH inaugural conference, psychiatrists identified the family unit, long
the primary stabilizing influence of society, as a target for direct assault:
“The family is now one of the major obstacles to improved mental health, and
hence should be weakened, if possible, so as to free individuals and especially
children from the coercion of family life.”
In the 1960s and ’70s, psychological programs known collectively as Outcome
Based Education (OBE) were introduced into schools. Psychiatrists and psychologists,
who directed the philosophy of OBE, claimed that three sources of stress had
to be eliminated from schools: 1) school failure 2) a curriculum centered around
academics and 3) disciplinary procedures. School failure was the chief villain,
they said, leading to “feelings of inferiority,” behavior problems like truancy
and an unsocial attitude.
Arm in arm, psychology and psychiatry set the stage for the collapse of education
at a profit to them. In 1962, they received nearly a billion dollars in the
United States alone for their role in education.
By 2002, funds channeled to them through “special education” for psychiatrist-defined
“learning disabilities” had reached $28 billion. However, the U.S. Department
of Education found that 40% of the children being spuriously labeled with these
“disorders” had simply never been taught to read.
Preaching their false and disturbing creed, the new “behaviorists” have successfully
insinuated themselves into positions of authority in schools and completed an
almost total overthrow of education. As a result, our once strong and effective
scholastic-based systems have been seriously compromised, and with them, the
impressive results of better years.
Author and educator Beverly Eakman states, “Most people today
suspect that education is not really about literacy, ‘basics,’
or proficiency at anything. What is less well understood is that
there exists in this country, and indeed throughout the industrialized
world, what can best be described as an ‘Illiteracy Cartel’—ostensibly
aimed at furthering ‘mental health.’ This cartel derives its power
from those who stand to benefit financially and politically from
ignorance and educational malpractice; from the frustration, the
crime, the joblessness and social chaos that mis-education produces.”
Next
Back
to Contents
|